Building with Glide compared to Adalo
Portrait of interviewee
Marc Fletcher
I build internet automations and measure brickwork.
Tech stack used:
Tool icon
Glide App
Tool icon

Maker: Marc Best Place to Find Him: Twitter or at through his product built Measured Work.

TL;DR Interview with Marc
Marc goes in depth about making and building his project Measured Work. What’s interesting is that product development is not his background. He is a Surveyor by trade and was able to use no-code tools to build a working application. 
Additionally, he goes through how can you decide between when to use Glide or to use Adalo. What are the positives of both and what are the limitations of each? Find out in this short read. 

Can you tell us a little bit about yourself and your story?

MF: I’m an experienced Quantity Surveyor working for volume house building contractors in the UK. After years of comfortable work, I want to expand my skills into developing business solutions using software.

Can you tell us how you got the idea for Measured Work, and thought process behind why did you use no-code. Why Adalo was your first choice?

MF: Like most ideas, it arose from the obvious need for better collection and use of data within the businesses I work for. The construction industry is traditionally late to exploit tech solutions and I want to see this changed. NoCode is a great compromise to build software with no risk or software development experience and the thriving tools are testament to the broad adoption of this new movement. I wanted a mobile-first solution and chose Adalo for the relational database and logical build process; the canvas and linked screens provide a nice UI (User Interface) for visual development. Adalo also has some great video tutorials and a helpful support forum.

Can you break down for us the limitations you found with Adalo and why it wasn’t the best option for you?

A key feature of Measured Work is capturing granular data of a project as it progresses and I found myself becoming frustrated by not being able to build everything I wanted. I also managed to irreversibly break a database relation which caused me to abandon an entire build.

Can you break down limitations you have found with Glide?

Glide has a data limit of 25’000 rows of data which would be insufficient to use in a ‘production-ready’ build for paying users. Measured Work records a time stamp value when certain parts of a project are marked as complete. A time stamp isn’t available with Glide so I used a Google Script instead. An unfortunate consequence of using Google Scripts is a time-delay of several seconds before the time stamp value is displayed in the app. This delay would be unacceptable in real life use. I also want to produce reports for users but Glide is incapable of this. Finally, the PWA (Progressive Web App) build that Glide produces is not widely adopted and lacks some features of a traditional app so may be treated with some scepticism by my potential users.

Can you compare Glide vs Adalo? Advantages and disadvantages?

They are both very similar tools in that they build mobile-first tools with great UI’s. Adalo has an integrated database, although their API allows connection to external data sources whereas Glide uses a Google Sheet. I have experience with Microsoft Excel so found the use of Google Sheets a natural step to take. Adalo have recently opened up a component market place which is getting wide approval and Glide are continuously rolling out upgrades. Glide is a cheaper option to upgrade from the free plan than Adalo and there will also be extra expense if you launch on the Google or Apple App stores. I would say if you have some spreadsheet experience, then Gilde will have a shallower learning curve that Adalo

Where do you see Makers/Startups/Businesses missing opportunity? 

I think there’s a lot of tools, services and newsletters being built for the NoCode community by the NoCode community when the real audience and customers are to be found outside of our comfort zone.


Marc, what do you see missing as to why we don’t see more makers take solutions to specific niches?

Reasons listed by Marc:
1. No-code awareness in general. People don’t know about it.
2. Education more niche experts need to learn how to make something
3. Guide, because these types of niche makers don’t know how to do product development, talking to users and product marketing to launch something.
Perhaps it’s mostly matters of experience and confidence that drive a maker to progress and build for wider markets. Experience in tool capabilities, limitations, costs, risk and marketing and confidence that comes with experience but also by being inspired by other successful makers.

Are there any automation tools like Zapier/Integromat/Parabola that you have dabbled with. Can you give your opinion on this tool?

I love using Integromat and am learning everything I can about it. The potential to automate any number of tasks is so exciting. When tools like Integromat can assure users of their data security, we’ll see an explosion of activity in automation tools.

When building anything there is always something unexpected that occured. What parts did you get stuck and learn most from?

I find that sometimes there are so many unanswerable questions that the only way to move forward is to build and expect to have to restart several times. Each new start will include the lessons you learnt from the previous build. I learnt that when dealing with lots of data and especially lots of similar data it’s essential to prevent ‘technical debt’ This means taking the time to avoid shortcuts that may cause problems when you are further along in your build. Use logical labels, be consistent and take the time to do things properly. You’ll thank yourself in the future.

What has helped you learn the most. Learning by doing? Should Makers just start making?

I enjoy searching Google for solutions and watching tutorials. If a tool has a mature documentation then take some time to read through it. Yes, start building and try everything. I think that even though you may not achieve what you set out to do then experience gained will serve you well.

Please provide what links to your project website, your twitter, where can people return the love?


Is there anything else you would like to share or some feedback/request/action that you’d like to ask the Side Project Stack Audience to do for you?

Measured Work is a prototype which is being used for demonstration and validation. If you know anyone who is a house building subcontractor in the UK that would be interested in helping test this software, please email Thank you.

Other awesome interviews

How Joel quit his job to start his own digital SaaS without writing code
Portrait of showcased interviewee
Joel Rosen
How getting tired of corporate life led to starting a business
Portrait of showcased interviewee
Building with Glide compared to Adalo
Portrait of showcased interviewee
Marc Fletcher
I build internet automations and measure brickwork.
Launched a digital product and make 6 figures in sales in 6 days.
Portrait of showcased interviewee
Portrait picture of Michael Novotny

Hi, i'm michael

I started Side Project Stack to help Makers reduce the time and effort to make stuff with no-code.I launched Get Stackd. A former #1 Product of the Day on Product Hunt. It helps Makers find the best no-code tools to use to make something. It's a 100% automated web app built with no-code.

What's interesting about it? Get Stackd take's the data from over dozens and dozens successfully made no-code projects to recommend the best starting point of tools to use to make your idea. I hope that you try it out. It's perfect for just starting out.Ill be adding more to the no-code space.

If you'd like to stay updated you can sign up for the newsletter and join over 3,000+ Makers getting the best insights on no-code and product management. Thanks for reading.